Cute title, the equivalent of the classic "SEX!!! Now that I have your attention..."
If ETFs are a "scam", then most managed funds with their bloated expense ratios that support huge bureaucraties, fancy offices and steak dinners for their managers should be called an "über-scam".
ETFs are good for broad market cap, fixed income or sector exposure. They are an excellent tool for the medium-sized portfolio (somewhere in the $100,000-$200,000 range) because of their low fees and transparency. For a portfolio less than that range, mutual funds with no trading fees are a good choice; if they are worth more, individual securities with 0 annual fees are probably a better choice than ETFs.
People are just trying to make it more complicated than it should be. I believe that ETFs should be used as the basic building blocks of a solid portfolio, but that still leaves some room for managed money and individual stocks/bonds for the more sophisticated or intrepid investor.
Do I believe the average Joe would do better with a balanced ETF portfolio (say, XIU/XIC, XSP, XIN and XBB/XCB) than with a mishmash of expensive funds? Yes.
As a portfolio grows, however, I believe ETFs should gradually be sold off and replaced with individual stocks/bonds, in order to completely eliminate annual expense ratios. This is what I will start to do within a year or two.
If ETFs are a "scam", then most managed funds with their bloated expense ratios that support huge bureaucraties, fancy offices and steak dinners for their managers should be called an "über-scam".
ETFs are good for broad market cap, fixed income or sector exposure. They are an excellent tool for the medium-sized portfolio (somewhere in the $100,000-$200,000 range) because of their low fees and transparency. For a portfolio less than that range, mutual funds with no trading fees are a good choice; if they are worth more, individual securities with 0 annual fees are probably a better choice than ETFs.
People are just trying to make it more complicated than it should be. I believe that ETFs should be used as the basic building blocks of a solid portfolio, but that still leaves some room for managed money and individual stocks/bonds for the more sophisticated or intrepid investor.
Do I believe the average Joe would do better with a balanced ETF portfolio (say, XIU/XIC, XSP, XIN and XBB/XCB) than with a mishmash of expensive funds? Yes.
As a portfolio grows, however, I believe ETFs should gradually be sold off and replaced with individual stocks/bonds, in order to completely eliminate annual expense ratios. This is what I will start to do within a year or two.