Please provide the direct link (was it inside the nypost.com link? If so, which one?) to the study you are using "facts" from.And to previous poster: you pick and choose your data. That's why it doesn't hold up to any kind of scrutiny.
Peer-reviewed study that was linked looks at 160 different Jurisdictions. Not 3-4 like you choose to try to make your point. Anyway, will take peer reviewed study from acclaimed scientists that look at 160 different jurisdictions over anonymous poster picking 3-4 data points to prove his point. And am surprised that anyone with their right mind would do differently.
And I am not presenting my opinion here. I am presenting FACTS from peer-reviewed study