Doubt it, DNA and virus decays pretty quickly outside of an animal host. So you agree, then, the point of the PCR test is that the person has in one point been infected with covid, and can be used to gauge the spread of the virus.
Nope, that's his interpretation with little to back it up other than conjecture. Basically, he points out a new, updated protocol to deal with samples and is assuming that it isn't applied to non-vaccinated.
You should probably inform the inventor of PCR tests that the fact checkers know more than him.
As for the denial of the PCR fraud. I encourage you to research some more. And don't bother with google, their goal is to manipulate you and direct you to sources that suit their interest. Or don't, whatever helps you sleep at night.
I've found Duckduckgo to be a game changer.