Canadian Money Forum banner
21 - 40 of 88 Posts
Plugging Along: just to clarify. When I said withdraw the maximum EAP within the tax shield I meant subject to RESP laws. The law around this is pretty clear and is part of the Income Tax Act. Just to elaborate a bit since there seems to be a lot of noise on this. The child beneficairy has to be enrolled in a recognized program. The maximum that can be withdrawn as an EAP is what the actual expenses are. There is nothing to say they have to use their own savings or scholarship before use of EAP, but it is clear that one should not make an EAP that exceeds the cost.
Unless they have updated the RESP rules in the last 4 or 5 years that is not correct. There is no law that says the RESP withdraws must not be more then the amount of education expenses.

The confusion that tends to make people think this is the case is the issue surrounding proof of enrolment. When one processes an EAP withdrawal the plan administrator (financial institution) will require proof of enrolment. They tend to lean towards a receipt for tuition paid as that proof. Many RESP subscribers tend to believe that they want this receipt to prove the amount of money spent and wrongly attempt to make the withdrawals equal to or less then that. That is not why they ask for the receipt. It is only to prove enrolment.

Once enrolment is proven, RESP withdrawals can be made in the amount of $5,000 maximum in the 1st 90 days and unlimited after that. The withdrawals can be a combination of any amount of capital, growth or CESG. For the CESG and growth, that will be taxable in the name of the beneficiary for whom the withdrawal is made. So the maximum really becomes more just an amount of CESG and Growth that provides the best tax advantage possible.

All money withdrawn is paid to the subscriber NOT the beneficiary. The beneficiary has absolutely no say in any of this...but does get tax bill.
 
Unless they have updated the RESP rules in the last 4 or 5 years that is not correct. There is no law that says the RESP withdraws must not be more then the amount of education expenses.

The confusion that tends to make people think this is the case is the issue surrounding proof of enrolment. When one processes an EAP withdrawal the plan administrator (financial institution) will require proof of enrolment. They tend to lean towards a receipt for tuition paid as that proof. Many RESP subscribers tend to believe that they want this receipt to prove the amount of money spent and wrongly attempt to make the withdrawals equal to or less then that. That is not why they ask for the receipt. It is only to prove enrolment.

Once enrolment is proven, RESP withdrawals can be made in the amount of $5,000 maximum in the 1st 90 days and unlimited after that. The withdrawals can be a combination of any amount of capital, growth or CESG. For the CESG and growth, that will be taxable in the name of the beneficiary for whom the withdrawal is made. So the maximum really becomes more just an amount of CESG and Growth that provides the best tax advantage possible.

All money withdrawn is paid to the subscriber NOT the beneficiary. The beneficiary has absolutely no say in any of this...but does get tax bill.
The subscriber (Me in this Case) owns the plan and initiates the withdrawal from the RESP as as you said typically all i have had to show was a letter of enrolment to support this goes with the withdrawal document at the bank.

EAP only goes to the Beneficiary or it does with TD Investing with my years of withdrawal as its the only option on the form and they will get a T4A for this money.

PSE can go to either the form has both options and I always transferred into my account

At no time does anyone ask you what you are using the money the bank or the Government does not require proof i have often already paid the fees and this withdrawal just refunds me but other times I have taken the PSE and invested it in my own account.
 

Attachments

The subscriber (Me in this Case) owns the plan and initiates the withdrawal from the RESP as as you said typically all i have had to show was a letter of enrolment to support this goes with the withdrawal document at the bank.

EAP only goes to the Beneficiary or it does with TD Investing with my years of withdrawal as its the only option on the form and they will get a T4A for this money.

PSE can go to either the form has both options and I always transferred into my account

At no time does anyone ask you what you are using the money the bank or the Government does not require proof i have often already paid the fees and this withdrawal just refunds me but other times I have taken the PSE and invested it in my own account.
Thanks for that. In the organizations I was involved with, if I recall correctly, the money all went to the subscriber but perhaps either TD is different or I was wrong. It does seem a little unfair to give the money to one person and the tax bill to another.

I am correct about the maximums being unlimited after 90 days. That I recall quite well.
 
It is only the EAP that has limitations, and only for the first semester for all practical purposes. In the case of BMOIL, EAP payments are only made to the beneficiary and the beneficiary gets the T4A. That is fine with me as that was the intent anyway.

Gov't would be happy to see accelerated withdrawals after the initial limitation to minimize their ultimate contribution to the cause.
 
So I looked it up and it was not difficult to find the rules pertaining to maximums.

for studies in a qualifying educational program
– $5,000, for the first 13 consecutive weeks in such a program. After the student has completed the 13 consecutive weeks, there is no limit on the amount of EAPs that can be paid if the student continues to qualify to receive them. If there is a 12-month period in which the student is not enrolled in a qualifying educational program for 13 consecutive weeks, the $5,000 maximum applies again;
and of course I stand corrected on the issue of who gets paid the withdrawal. Thanks oldgreyguy.

The promoter can only pay EAPs to or for a student if one of the following situations applies:
 
Discussion starter · #26 ·
Looks like you have a good start and plan which many do not!

Our tough year was 2018 when we had all three in University at the same time which really meant we took a lot of money out of the RESP to support the cost.

I assume its $220k total for all three not each or you would be very good the trust accounts can be accessed by them at 18 so if needed you can have them fund part of their University costs as well.

We are retiring in the next two years and we will be ok and I am sure you will be as well

Keep up the good work

Good luck
I only have two kids. The thought of funding more would cause me to grow gray much faster. I anticipate that there will be at least 1 year where both are in school, possibly 4 if they both go to past the first degree. That's why I have my earliest retirement date based on when the first might be done school, and the latest hopefully when the last one is done.
Congrats on your up coming retirement and have the kid leave the nest!
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
Its more than most and a great plan. Congrats on having the foresight to plan it and do it. You never know, compounding of returns might just bring it home for you.
Yes, here's to good returns! Hopefully, my plan will hold somewhat true.
 
The subscriber (Me in this Case) owns the plan and initiates the withdrawal from the RESP as as you said typically all i have had to show was a letter of enrolment to support this goes with the withdrawal document at the bank.

EAP only goes to the Beneficiary or it does with TD Investing with my years of withdrawal as its the only option on the form and they will get a T4A for this money.

PSE can go to either the form has both options and I always transferred into my account

At no time does anyone ask you what you are using the money the bank or the Government does not require proof i have often already paid the fees and this withdrawal just refunds me but other times I have taken the PSE and invested it in my own account.
Interesting that they want the expenses detailed if above a $24,000 withdrawal.
 
Interesting that they want the expenses detailed if above a $24,000 withdrawal.
Yup I think that is the value that gates the CRA interested but I have always done different lower withdrawals so I use a form for each student.

In 2018 I did three separate withdrawals as all three of ours were in University at the same time and I was audited in 2019 and so I provided the CRA three separate T2202 Tuition and Enrolment Certificates as well as the enrollment letters to support the claim and they had no issues.

(I do my taxes myself using Ufile)
 
Unless they have updated the RESP rules in the last 4 or 5 years that is not correct. There is no law that says the RESP withdraws must not be more then the amount of education expenses.

The confusion that tends to make people think this is the case is the issue surrounding proof of enrolment. When one processes an EAP withdrawal the plan administrator (financial institution) will require proof of enrolment. They tend to lean towards a receipt for tuition paid as that proof.
Agreed there is no requirement for an invoice - proof of enrolment is required.

However, you are incorrect as it relates to the EAPs and the requirement that these funds are used for education expenses. It is quite clear that an EAP can only be used for expenses that further the beneficiaries post secondary education. This is all expenses related to furthering the education and not just tuition. You may refer to the link below, in the section entitled Educational Assistance Payments. In particular refer to subsection 6 and 6 (c) for the penalties of not doing so. In practice the administrators will follow bulletin R1 (second link) for the guideline amounts per year.


 
Agreed there is no requirement for an invoice - proof of enrolment is required.

However, you are incorrect as it relates to the EAPs and there required use for education expenses. It is quite clear that an EAP can only be used for expenses that further the beneficiaries post secondary education. This is all expenses related to furthering the education and not just tuition. You may refer to the link below, in the section entitled Educational Assistance Payments. In particular refer to subsection 6 and 6 (c) for the penalties of not doing so. In practice the administrators will follow bulletin R1 (second link) for the guideline amounts per year.


Not for me the thousands of dollars in EAP have given to my kids has contributed $0 to their education costs in reality as I had already paid them.

Not once have i have been ask to prove where the EAP money is going after I Have met the withdrawal criteria and not once have my kids ever had to show that $5k of EAP went to $5k of education ever in 14 years of withdrawing.
 
Not for me the thousands of dollars in EAP have given to my kids has contributed $0 to their education costs in reality as I had already paid them.

Not once have i have been ask to prove where the EAP money is going after I Have met the withdrawal criteria and not once have my kids ever had to show that $5k of EAP went to $5k of education ever in 14 years of withdrawing.
The rules are quite clear. Whether they are followed or not is a different matter. Whether the Gov't enforces or not is another matter again. Just providing the rules and the links if people want to follow them.
 
I am talking about the requirements. I have no doubt the intention was for the money to be used for education, hence probably why TD wants some letter of direction for withdrawals over $24K. Most other companies do not care about that. I am just saying there is no requirement to prove the money went to education expenses. You can literally make up anything once you prove your child is enrolled. Say your kid eats well at school and spent it all on caviar. No one really cares.

Hopefully we are clear on that. That was the important correction I wanted to make.
 
The rules are quite clear. Whether they are followed or not is a different matter. Whether the Gov't enforces or not is another matter again. Just providing the rules and the links if people want to follow them.
I am talking about the requirements. I have no doubt the intention was for the money to be used for education, hence probably why TD wants some letter of direction for withdrawals over $24K. Most other companies do not care about that. I am just saying there is no requirement to prove the money went to education expenses. You can literally make up anything once you prove your child is enrolled. Say your kid eats well at school and spent it all on caviar. No one really cares.

Hopefully we are clear on that. That was the important correction I wanted to make.
CRA issued a bulletin stating what amounts are considered “reasonable” in order to reduce the administrative burden on resp promoters. Above that amount, the promoter is able to ask for details of the expenses and it appears the promoter is the one who assesses what’s reasonable.

 
and of course I stand corrected on the issue of who gets paid the withdrawal. Thanks oldgreyguy.
In the case of BMOIL, EAP payments are only made to the beneficiary and the beneficiary gets the T4A.
This was not my experience at BMOIL.

I asked for EAP withdrawals, and directed that the money (or securities -- you can also make withdrawals 'in kind') go to my account. No problem.

In fact, you can see the option to send the funds to the subscriber's account on BMOIL's withdrawal form:


Image




I can't speak to what other institutions do. But restricting EAP withdrawals to the beneficiary does not make sense to me -- payments may well be made up front by the subscriber, who wishes to be reimbursed.

Personally, I would escalate if told the EAP withdrawal could not go to my account.
 
This was not my experience at BMOIL.

I asked for EAP withdrawals, and directed that the money (or securities -- you can also make withdrawals 'in kind') go to my account. No problem.

In fact, you can see the option to send the funds to the subscriber's account on BMOIL's withdrawal form:


View attachment 22131



I can't speak to what other institutions do. But restricting EAP withdrawals to the beneficiary does not make sense to me -- payments may well be made up front by the subscriber, who wishes to be reimbursed.

Personally, I would escalate if told the EAP withdrawal could not go to my account.
EAP goes to the Beneficiary and its classed at income you cannot change that however assuming you have a good relationship with your kids they can transfer all or some of it back to you.

This is what have done with all three kids as i have already paid their tuition.
 
CRA issued a bulletin stating what amounts are considered “reasonable” in order to reduce the administrative burden on resp promoters. Above that amount, the promoter is able to ask for details of the expenses and it appears the promoter is the one who assesses what’s reasonable.

Because the government only requires them to document how the money is used if the EAP exceeds the annual EAP threshold, which is currently about $24,600, the RESP providers are unlikely to assess the reasonableness of expenses below this amount.
 
This was not my experience at BMOIL.

I asked for EAP withdrawals, and directed that the money (or securities -- you can also make withdrawals 'in kind') go to my account. No problem.

In fact, you can see the option to send the funds to the subscriber's account on BMOIL's withdrawal form:


View attachment 22131



I can't speak to what other institutions do. But restricting EAP withdrawals to the beneficiary does not make sense to me -- payments may well be made up front by the subscriber, who wishes to be reimbursed.

Personally, I would escalate if told the EAP withdrawal could not go to my account.
The way I read the BMOIL form, it tells me the original Capital can go to either Subscriber or Beneficiary but the form limits EAP (CESG + investment gains) to the beneficiary (the next portion of the form). Given you have real life experience however, I obviously will defer to you.

I am many years away yet before withdrawing from the RESP so it is not an issue for me....but regardless, I can control how much EAP is issued and I would want it to go to the beneficiary (grandchild in my case). I agree I should be entitled to get my original capital back but I don't believe I should be the receiver of the EAP.
 
21 - 40 of 88 Posts