Thanks for sharing this. I haven't listened to the whole thing but it seems interesting. Here's a bit of a transcript of a little piece.
Guest: When you look at these guys (renowned investors who have a public investing record) and investment firms with good histories, if you make a list of 10 or 12 of these investors, you'll find that in 2014-2016, as a group, they typically under-performed by 10% to 20%. It's never happened before, it's unprecedented, and one of the telling aspects of this is that none of these guys uses the same methodology. There's very little overlap in their portfolios and they're really doing different things. As a mental experiment, what is the statistical probability that somehow, they all lost touch at the same time and they all got stupid together?
Interviewer: It's fascinating because you flip the discussion on its head. In the last couple years, we've seen in all the major publications that all these active managers have lost their touch. The argument behind that is that it no longer makes sense to invest actively. Your point is: what is the anomaly? Is it that all these guys are losing their touch, or is the index the actual anomaly?
Guest: Are these characters the anomaly, for underperforming, or is the market (the S&P 500) the anomaly for outperforming? It sounds bizarre to say, until the aftermath. I would propose that the market is anomalous now. Not just anomalous, but the market has never in history been this mis-priced.