Yeah, because farmers like to spend money on fertilizer as a hobby - not to increase food production......
If not for GM we would have electric cars alreadyThere is always opposition to progress by some people. It is well known in business that many people fear change, and sometimes it must be forced.
Uhh we already have electric cars.If not for GM we would have electric cars already
Thanks GM
It's not unheard of for autocratic regimes to take control of the food supply as a political tool.Yeah, because farmers like to spend money on fertilizer as a hobby - not to increase food production......
Who Killed the Electric Car? Spoiler it was GM and the oil industry. Same reason US is designed so you have to drive everywhere etcUhh we already have electric cars.
Also GM was mass producing electric cars a decade before Tesla... so it isn't like they were holding back the industry.
Yes a propaganda film will push an agenda.Who Killed the Electric Car? Spoiler it was GM and the oil industry. Same reason US is designed so you have to drive everywhere etc
The farmers already do that, because as I stated:A 30% reduction in fertilizer use by 2030 is a stretch goal, that will encourage research into better fertilizers and farming practices that are already underway.
“We need to continue to drive innovation. We are going to be their work to work with you. This is not an us (government) versus you (farmers), we have a policy in place, this is where we are trying to go in the future,” said Blais. “The work done to this point by farmers is great, but we can do more.”
Yeah, I watched a farmer being interviewed who was exasperated that the government didn't understand that farmers absolutely fine tune their fertilizer to produce the maximum crop, and that not a single percent point of extra is used since that would reduce profits and yield. He said he couldn't reduce more than a single percentage point of fertilizer before his crop yield would be reduced. This insanity of reducing fertilizer by 30% would really reduce food production in the country.So no, this isn't progress. This is decreasing food production, increasing prices, increasing starvation. Artificial limits on fertilizer use leads to nothing but what I just mentioned here.
They are literally working to destroy food supply
I know, you love Tesla and all that is shy and new, but as discussed before it isn't as simple as that.
There is widespread opposition to electric cars with people claiming they will burn to death and all kinds of thingsThere was widespread opposition to increasing fuel mileage for vehicles, but the stretch goals and mandates worked.
There was widespread opposition to seat belts, with people claiming they would be trapped in vehicles and burn to death. The mandate worked.
There was opposition to life saving vaccines. The restrictions worked to force the majority to get a vaccine shot.
There is always opposition to progress by some people. It is well known in business that many people fear change, and sometimes it must be forced.
They even adapt the amount of fertilizer where it is required and less where it is not by mapping out previous years by gpsYeah, I watched a farmer being interviewed who was exasperated that the government didn't understand that farmers absolutely fine tune their fertilizer to produce the maximum crop, and that not a single percent point of extra is used since that would reduce profits and yield. He said he couldn't reduce more than a single percentage point of fertilizer before his crop yield would be reduced. This insanity of reducing fertilizer by 30% would really reduce food production in the country.
ltr
My 'favourite' are all the idiots that like to punish cyclists for riding on the road, or taking the lane. I regularly get 'punish passes' where drivers illegally pass you within a couple feet in the same lane. Same for all the drivers who get butt hurt about cyclists rolling stop signs and riding the wrong way on low volume one way residential streets. Those rules are nonsensical to apply to bikes. North America waaaay overuses stop signs and traffic lights. We should be using more roundabouts and yieldsLane spliting is illegal where I live but where it is legal, sure some get mad. Those that get mad and do something dangerous (road rage) need to be arrested. But this is different than generational stereotyping.
Yea Europe was pretty awesome for bikes. Lots of dedicated bike roads, traffic designed in an efficient way and kids could even play in the streets. It boggles my mind everything a bike or something is in the oncoming lane and oncoming traffic maintains speed as if I should yield or some kind of game of chicken. Europeans were far better drivers in many waysNorth America waaaay overuses stop signs and traffic lights. We should be using more roundabouts and yields
I've already got a ticket and lost points on my driver's license because I was in the wrong way of a one-way street with my bike.riding the wrong way on low volume one way residential streets. Those rules are nonsensical to apply to bikes.
Canada has become a nanny stateI've already got a ticket and lost points on my driver's license because I was in the wrong way of a one-way street with my bike.
What I don't get is that you need a driver's license to drive a car and you'll lose points if you don't follow the rules, that makes sense, but you don't need a driver's license to drive a bike and yet you'll also lose points on your driver's license for cars if you don't follow the rules... but other cyclists without a driver's license only get to pay the ticket, as they cannot lose points.
It'd be nice if they were mass producing them now. They made less than 500 vehicles in Q1.Uhh we already have electric cars.
Also GM was mass producing electric cars a decade before Tesla... so it isn't like they were holding back the industry.
I don't mind winter though, but for sure I'd prefer places where I can both surf and ski the same weekend.Lots of other good countries out there that aren't cold for 6