i have 2 kids, 2 and 0. so with 5x annual salary for me and spouse, are we over or under or rightly insured?

1 - 20 of 27 Posts

i have 2 kids, 2 and 0. so with 5x annual salary for me and spouse, are we over or under or rightly insured?

Joined

·
688 Posts

Thankfully I didn't die when my daughter was a child and I only had $100,000 in life insurance.

Joined

·
3,197 Posts

When you subtract assets, I hope you aren't subtracting assets the survivor really doesn't want to liquidate early (like RRSPs).

I expect to have mortgage cleared in 5-6 years, and a much higher net worth then, so expect that I'll be able to cut our insurance at least in half when term is up. As MoneyGal states, self insurance should be the eventual goal.

Joined

·
107 Posts

We each have very good jobs that even working part-time would be able to handle our monthly expenses.

Once we have children (before actually) we'll take out additional policies to cover the costs of the loss in income should should one of us pass.

we have two kids, one is a special needs kid.

if the surviving spouse puts all the money in bonds it will cover at least a good portion of the loss in income.

as an aside, i don't have any supporting stats but i figure the probability of one of us dying while our children are young is much higher than us winning the lottery. so the way we see it, instead of buying lotto tickets, we pay for term insurance instead!

btw, it feels good to know that you are adequately covered and are sacrificing and doing what you can do to provide for your dependent children even when you're gone....

Joined

·
5,464 Posts

As an example, the probability that at least one a couple now aged 30 (M) and 28 (F) surviving the next 25 years is 99.8%. (M probability is 93.3 and F probability is 96.3.)

I'd go with multiple of annual expense as more meaningful. I'm around 15. Maybe this is a high multiple, but term life is so cheap relative to the peace of mind it offers. I hope to be "self-insured" sooner than later, at which point I'll reduce the coverage significantly.if instead of quoting real numbers like 250k, 1mil etc, if you guys could quote the multiple of annual income, it would be more informative and a fair comparison...

From a risk perspective, once your dependants financial vulnerability disappears, there is no need for life insurance. Factor in for income taxes as well. First priority is to cover the financial liablities.

Joined

·
5,464 Posts

Why do you want a multiple of income? Is the intention that the surviving spouse receive the income you would have brought in for a set number of years?

However, I recognize that employer-provided group life insurance is often provided as a multiple of income, so perhaps that's where that stat comes in. But if you don't have employer-provided insurance, I don't really understand the multiples of income approach.

i agree there can be better ways to figure out the amount of coverage but the multiples of income is not totally meaningless. i believe that a person's lifestyle is generally defined by his annual income (for a salaried person of course). and most generally after certain number of years into ones career, the income does not significantly change. i do not consider a 10-20% increase due to change or role/company a significant change. and once your family is accustomed to this lifestyle, you would want to insure your life to a value that is sufficient for your family to continue this lifestyle without major hurdles.

Why do you want a multiple of income? Is the intention that the surviving spouse receive the income you would have brought in for a set number of years?

However, I recognize that employer-provided group life insurance is often provided as a multiple of income, so perhaps that's where that stat comes in. But if you don't have employer-provided insurance, I don't really understand the multiples of income approach.

for examples, lets take a person with an annual income of 100k. after tax and personal expense of the earning member and his retirement savings, lets say the family is used to a lifestyle of having 40k disposable income. now if this person had an insurance for 750k and were to pass away, this 500k would fetch close 40k per annum if invested at 5% rate of return. of course the example is crude since i hv not accounted for taxes but as u can see, the figures can be traced back to multiples of annual income.

Joined

·
5,464 Posts

I don't totally understand the example you gave (how does insurance of $750K compare to an after-tax salary of $40K - and how did $750K become $500K in your example?).

However, as a general rule, insurance can be keyed to the discounted value of your human capital - a slightly different concept than "multiples of income."

What might that value be? Here's an interesting calculator to play around with (it's the first one at the link - I can't link to it directly).

it was alwasy 750k not sure y i typed 500k. sorry about that. as i mentioned 750k invested at a 5% rate of return fetches close to 40k, 37.5k to be precise...I don't totally understand the example you gave (how does insurance of $750K compare to an after-tax salary of $40K - and how did $750K become $500K in your example?).

are u suggesting one should insure their life to the value provided by this calculator?What might that value be? Here's an interesting calculator to play around with (it's the first one at the link - I can't link to it directly).

hmm, i guess this calculator (i am not sure how it exactly calculates) the value at the retirement age mentioned. but if u were to be deceased well before that age, you would never earn that. secondly, since the person is not living, there is no need of planning for retirement. so it would be an awesome lot of money to insure oneself for.

1 - 20 of 27 Posts

Join the discussion

Canadian Money Forum

A forum community dedicated to Canadian personal finance enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about investing, stock portfolios, equities, frugality, real estate, market trading, taxation, retirement, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!