Canadian Money Forum banner
1 - 3 of 12 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
638 Posts
Farouk said:
ETF performance - does it include dividend?
Yes … the values RBCDI displays in that screen include distributions (but note that distributions may or may not be dividend) … however, it is not as simple as adding the distribution amounts to the NAV … it is a calculation, on the assumption that the distributions are reinvested.

Other brokers such as TDDI (Webbroker) and Scotia iTrade do the same thing … as do popular quote sites like Yahoo Finance … they all display trailing returns that include distributions.

Farouk said:
Would you see these returns if you dripped the dividend?
Close, maybe … but never exact … these reported trailing returns are hypothetical … no actual, real-world reinvestments take place, so they are just fictitious calculated values … and they do not (because they cannot) incorporate any of your transaction patterns into the reported performance values.

In the real world, your personal rate of return depends on several factors including the timing and amounts of your investments into the fund (ie. new money added), whether or not you DRIP, how that DRIP is executed, and so on. The important thing to remember is that RBCDI is NOT making any attempt, in this screen, to represent your personal returns. If you want your personal returns, for any particular holding, your best bet is to calculate them yourself.

Farouk said:
I have answered my own Question with an Internet search!
A trailing return looks at how an investment -- such as a mutual fund -- performed on a historical basis.
You have to be careful … words often have multiple, alternate meanings … in this case, the definition you found does happen to apply, but you can’t assume that the words “trailing return” will always be used in that context.

TomB16 said:
WebBroker, … will cite gains
OP was asking about returns … gains are not the same thing.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
638 Posts
GreatLaker said:
My personal returns for the ETF ranged from 0.3 percentage points lower to 0.6 percentage points higher than the returns reported by the fund provider. I attribute the difference to cash drag and market fluctuations.
Its just that you’re comparing apples and oranges. Money-weighted and time-weighted returns are supposed to be different, as are DRIP’d and non-DRIP’d results … if they were the same, I’d consider that a red flag and I’d be looking for a mistake somewhere.

GreatLaker said:
… for the mutual fund … the distributions are automatically reinvested, my personal return is the same as the fund's return.
Yeah, mutual funds are easy … reinvestment of distributions is the norm for conventional MF and is executed by the fund company itself … there are no third parties involved in MF DRIPs, so it is handled EXACTLY the same way every time, for every investor, regardless of which brokerage they might hold the fund through … there would still be the money-weighted v. time-weighted deviation, but if one doesn’t add or remove any money during a period, the investor’s personal ROR for that holding should exactly match the rates of return reported by the fund company.

GreatLaker said:
Without reinvesting the distributions, the investor's return for the holding will be lower than the fund's actual return if the fund's returns are positive.
Actually, it’s the other way around … if the underlying investment is growing over time, then DRIPing suppresses the rate of return … you’re frequently adding new money, at higher and higher prices, so the rate of return gets diluted … kind of like “averaging up”.

I first noticed this in connection with a pair of US electric utilities I own, which were both purchased around the same time, in 2002 when the entire US electric utility industry was being punished for Enron’s sins … they've have similar share price appreciation, and similar yields, but the one that DRIPs has consistently had a lower rate of return than the other, over 20+ years … I’ve since tested this observation with some of the stocks that I’ve been DRIPing for 15 to 25 years, and in 100% of the cases I’ve tested, the rate of return is lower with DRIP, than without.

So a retiree who harvests dividend income for spending will generally achieve a higher return on that particular stock, than someone who is in accumulation mode, and participating in DRIP.

GreatLaker said:
To see investment return including distributions and accrued interest in WebBroker, look at the Performance tab
As far as I can tell, that Performance tab only applies to the entire account (or whatever group of accounts you select) in aggregate … not to individual holdings within an account.
 
1 - 3 of 12 Posts
Top