[Farouk]

I have VDY in my direct investment account with RBC

Does the TRAILING RETURN include dividends?

Would you see these returns if you dripped the dividend? The date is Jan 31 2023, The table is from RBC DI website

 

[Farouk]

I have answered my own Question with an Internet search!

A trailing return looks at how an investment -- such as a mutual fund -- performed on a historical basis. The return consists of the change in share price over a recent period of time plus any dividends earned per share and converted to a percentage gain or loss

 

[james4beach]

Does the TRAILING RETURN include dividends?

It depends where it's quoted. The industry standard method for quoting mutual fund (and ETF) returns includes distributions, so they are total returns. That's the case with Morningstar or officially published fund performance.

However, some other places (like Yahoo finance and the old Google finance) don't always include distributions, so they may NOT be total returns. Many web sites with quotes forget to include the distributions.

So it's a bit tricky

 

[TomB16]

As James pointed out, there is a different between returns and total returns. You cited trailing total return.

In WebBroker, it will cite gains non-inclusive of dividends. It is simply equity price at time <A> divided by equity price at time <B>.

Account gains were way low. I could take my balance at the end of the year and divide by my balance at the start of that same year and get a number far in excess of WebBroker reported gains in a locked in account. This is because I was DRIPping companies. They ignore the dividend. When a DRIP happens, they simply DCA the new tranche into the position. In this way, it would very gently push up my purchase cost over time which just slightly diminishes the gain in WB, even though the balance is increased.

 

[cardhu]

ETF performance - does it include dividend?

Yes … the values RBCDI displays in that screen include distributions (but note that distributions may or may not be dividend) … however, it is not as simple as adding the distribution amounts to the NAV … it is a calculation, on the assumption that the distributions are reinvested.

Other brokers such as TDDI (Webbroker) and Scotia iTrade do the same thing … as do popular quote sites like Yahoo Finance … they all display trailing returns that include distributions.

Would you see these returns if you dripped the dividend?

Close, maybe … but never exact … these reported trailing returns are hypothetical … no actual, real-world reinvestments take place, so they are just fictitious calculated values … and they do not (because they cannot) incorporate any of your transaction patterns into the reported performance values.

In the real world, your personal rate of return depends on several factors including the timing and amounts of your investments into the fund (ie. new money added), whether or not you DRIP, how that DRIP is executed, and so on. The important thing to remember is that RBCDI is NOT making any attempt, in this screen, to represent your personal returns. If you want your personal returns, for any particular holding, your best bet is to calculate them yourself.

I have answered my own Question with an Internet search!
A trailing return looks at how an investment -- such as a mutual fund -- performed on a historical basis.

You have to be careful … words often have multiple, alternate meanings … in this case, the definition you found does happen to apply, but you can’t assume that the words “trailing return” will always be used in that context.

WebBroker, … will cite gains

OP was asking about returns … gains are not the same thing.

 

[GreatLaker]

OP was asking about returns … gains are not the same thing.

Yup. To see investment return including distributions and accrued interest in WebBroker, look at the Performance tab, not the Gain & Loss tab.

To open a help screen in WebBroker, there is a ❔ icon under the Print icon near the top right of most screens. But we are men, we never read help or ask directions right?

 

[Beaver101]

Yes … the values RBCDI displays in that screen include distributions (but note that distributions may or may not be dividend) … however, it is not as simple as adding the distribution amounts to the NAV … it is a calculation, on the assumption that the distributions are reinvested.

Other brokers such as TDDI (Webbroker) and Scotia iTrade do the same thing … as do popular quote sites like Yahoo Finance … they all display trailing returns that include distributions.


Close, maybe … but never exact … these reported trailing returns are hypothetical … no actual, real-world reinvestments take place, so they are just fictitious calculated values … and they do not (because they cannot) incorporate any of your transaction patterns into the reported performance values.

In the real world, your personal rate of return depends on several factors including the timing and amounts of your investments into the fund (ie. new money added), whether or not you DRIP, how that DRIP is executed, and so on. The important thing to remember is that RBCDI is NOT making any attempt, in this screen, to represent your personal returns. If you want your personal returns, for any particular holding, your best bet is to calculate them yourself.


You have to be careful … words often have multiple, alternate meanings … in this case, the definition you found does happen to apply, but you can’t assume that the words “trailing return” will always be used in that context.


OP was asking about returns … gains are not the same thing.

... as J4B was saying in hist post #3, it's abit tricky. This tells me what's published for the "public" is iffy (if not misleading).

So how about this? Can we just estimate it. Eg. 10 years return is 10% as published, then prepare that the real return is 9%? Of course, if you own the funds, then your Personal ROR should be accurate.

 

[GreatLaker]

... as J4B was saying in hist post #3, it's abit tricky. This tells me what's published for the "public" is iffy (if not misleading).

So how about this? Can we just estimate it. Eg. 10 years return is 10% as published, then prepare that the real return is 9%? Of course, if you own the funds, then your Personal ROR should be accurate.

It's a wise man who said "it's a bit tricky".

I checked two of my holdings, a mutual fund where I have the distributions reinvested, and an ETF where I take the distributions in cash. I compared my personal returns from Quicken, which calculates money weighted returns against the fund provider's reported total returns, over 1, 3 and 5 years.

My personal returns for the mutual fund were within 0.1 percentage points of the fund's reported returns. I attribute that either rounding error or slight difference in the calculation method. Quicken reports money weighted return, whereas the funds would report time weighted returns. Because the distributions are automatically reinvested, my personal return is the same as the fund's return.

My personal returns for the ETF ranged from 0.3 percentage points lower to 0.6 percentage points higher than the returns reported by the fund provider. I attribute the difference to cash drag and market fluctuations.

There is the fund's return vs. the investor's return. Without reinvesting the distributions, the investor's return for the holding will be lower than the fund's actual return if the fund's returns are positive. On the other hand, if the fund's return is negative, your personal return can be higher than the fund's return if the distributions are not reinvested.

But I don't leave the distributions in cash, I reinvest them in something. Right now I have <0.2% cash. So while my returns on any one holding may be lower because I don't reinvest the distributions, my return on my overall portfolio will be close to the aggregate of all my holdings.

My lesson from this is keep your money invested. If you don't DRIP, then reinvest cash distributions in something else, without incurring high transaction costs. Also some retired investors may use the cash from distributions to fund living expenses. This has been a bit of a navel gazing exercise, but there are worse hobbies than tracking and managing investments.

 

[Beaver101]

^ Thank you for those details!

 

[cardhu]

My personal returns for the ETF ranged from 0.3 percentage points lower to 0.6 percentage points higher than the returns reported by the fund provider. I attribute the difference to cash drag and market fluctuations.

Its just that you’re comparing apples and oranges. Money-weighted and time-weighted returns are supposed to be different, as are DRIP’d and non-DRIP’d results … if they were the same, I’d consider that a red flag and I’d be looking for a mistake somewhere.

… for the mutual fund … the distributions are automatically reinvested, my personal return is the same as the fund's return.

Yeah, mutual funds are easy … reinvestment of distributions is the norm for conventional MF and is executed by the fund company itself … there are no third parties involved in MF DRIPs, so it is handled EXACTLY the same way every time, for every investor, regardless of which brokerage they might hold the fund through … there would still be the money-weighted v. time-weighted deviation, but if one doesn’t add or remove any money during a period, the investor’s personal ROR for that holding should exactly match the rates of return reported by the fund company.

Without reinvesting the distributions, the investor's return for the holding will be lower than the fund's actual return if the fund's returns are positive.

Actually, it’s the other way around … if the underlying investment is growing over time, then DRIPing suppresses the rate of return … you’re frequently adding new money, at higher and higher prices, so the rate of return gets diluted … kind of like “averaging up”.

I first noticed this in connection with a pair of US electric utilities I own, which were both purchased around the same time, in 2002 when the entire US electric utility industry was being punished for Enron’s sins … they've have similar share price appreciation, and similar yields, but the one that DRIPs has consistently had a lower rate of return than the other, over 20+ years … I’ve since tested this observation with some of the stocks that I’ve been DRIPing for 15 to 25 years, and in 100% of the cases I’ve tested, the rate of return is lower with DRIP, than without.

So a retiree who harvests dividend income for spending will generally achieve a higher return on that particular stock, than someone who is in accumulation mode, and participating in DRIP.

To see investment return including distributions and accrued interest in WebBroker, look at the Performance tab

As far as I can tell, that Performance tab only applies to the entire account (or whatever group of accounts you select) in aggregate … not to individual holdings within an account.

 

[cardhu]

.

 

[GreatLaker]

Its just that you’re comparing apples and oranges. Money-weighted and time-weighted returns are supposed to be different, as are DRIP’d and non-DRIP’d results … if they were the same, I’d consider that a red flag and I’d be looking for a mistake somewhere.

A response upthread suggested that the investor's return could be estimated at 1 percentage point less than the investment return. I demonstrated that is not a good assumption and the actual situation is more complex and nuanced. Money weighted vs time weighted should not be an issue in my comparison. The mutual find had no external cashflows during the 3 years, and the ETF had one small withdrawal relative to the holding value.

Yeah, mutual funds are easy … reinvestment of distributions is the norm for conventional MF and is executed by the fund company itself … there are no third parties involved in MF DRIPs, so it is handled EXACTLY the same way every time, for every investor, regardless of which brokerage they might hold the fund through … there would still be the money-weighted v. time-weighted deviation, but if one doesn’t add or remove any money during a period, the investor’s personal ROR for that holding should exactly match the rates of return reported by the fund company.

Agree. The point I was trying to make is the more effectively distributions can be reinvested, the closer the investor's return will be to the investment return. That's easy with mutual fund DRIPs. It's harder with ETFs and stocks where there can be delays before investing the distributions resulting in cash drag, and the difficulty or inability to purchase fractional shares.

Actually, it’s the other way around … if the underlying investment is growing over time, then DRIPing suppresses the rate of return … you’re frequently adding new money, at higher and higher prices, so the rate of return gets diluted … kind of like “averaging up”.

I was referring to the total holding for the investment. If the investment return is higher than the investor can get on cash deposits, then reinvesting will result in the investor having more money at a future time (unless I have some major misunderstanding of how investing works). Investors cannot spend rate of return.

As far as I can tell, that Performance tab only applies to the entire account (or whatever group of accounts you select) in aggregate … not to individual holdings within an account.

Correct. The other post referred to gains, I was just pointing out the Returns tab, even though it does not allow reporting on individual holdings.