You first have to learn a lot more detail on how those simulations deal wth stop losses down to the nitty gritty.
For instance is the back-test only using close of day values? Or would it trigger the sell-on-stop with an intraday, even extremely brief, decline in price below the stop? In real life that's exactly the kind of volatility that would trigger a stop, killing your position even if it closes much higher the same day.
Additionally, does their back testing platform have second-by-second granularity of the bid and asks price along with the order book at each state? I seriously doubt it -- that's an immense amount of data. This becomes important because once a stop triggers, your stock doesn't get sold exactly at the stop price. Instead, you will get a fill at "market" which could be quite a bit below your stop price.
These are nuances that create a divergence between such back test simulations, and real life. I suspect that you're getting a rose coloured view of what stops can accomplish for you. Large swings tend to occur pretty frequently in individual stocks, and 7% would be considered an awfully tight stop. I suspect that if you used this method in the real market, your stops would trigger a lot more often than you expect, hurting your returns.
For instance is the back-test only using close of day values? Or would it trigger the sell-on-stop with an intraday, even extremely brief, decline in price below the stop? In real life that's exactly the kind of volatility that would trigger a stop, killing your position even if it closes much higher the same day.
Additionally, does their back testing platform have second-by-second granularity of the bid and asks price along with the order book at each state? I seriously doubt it -- that's an immense amount of data. This becomes important because once a stop triggers, your stock doesn't get sold exactly at the stop price. Instead, you will get a fill at "market" which could be quite a bit below your stop price.
These are nuances that create a divergence between such back test simulations, and real life. I suspect that you're getting a rose coloured view of what stops can accomplish for you. Large swings tend to occur pretty frequently in individual stocks, and 7% would be considered an awfully tight stop. I suspect that if you used this method in the real market, your stops would trigger a lot more often than you expect, hurting your returns.