They must have some great minds behind the scenes to be able to work with many different types of systems and make it so profitable. Im not up on this one, but story sounds good.Excellent results released Wednesday. It will be interesting to listen to the CC Thursday morning, just before the bell. The stock still looks pretty cheap for me. The balance sheet is very solid and management negociated a larger credit facility, which should help fund bigger acquisitions. With earnings close to $8 in 2011, I see the dividend going higher later this year.
prob just an irrational move, therefore a buying opportunity.If the company is good, the fundamentals are good, the dividend is good, the balance sheet is good - so why is the market so pessimistic after the results - was there bad guidance given?
félicitations if u are holding.Strong Q4 and annual results for Constellation Software. Up 10%+ today.
No smart investor would have a problem with a company delivering a 35% return on equity hanging onto cash and reinvesting in the business.Is it from TDW? TDW has always given the 'hold' position on CSU. One thing I'm concerned is the remark from their President, Mark Leonard, who said that he anticipates making further acquisitions, which may consume the free cash flow. When that happens, CSU would not hesitate reducing or eliminating the dividend.
Not that they pay a high yield, but I wonder if shareholders would respond unkindly to his remarks or his plan.
No smart investor would rely on a company delivering a 35% return on equity.No smart investor would have a problem with a company delivering a 35% return on equity hanging onto cash and reinvesting in the business.
Maybe I am being to subtle.^ Maybe it's the way I read it, but why wouldn't anyone rely on a company that can deliver good growth (i.e., 35% ROE)? True, it's not cheap, but the company has delivered even through the bad times.
The point is an investor is extremely unlikely to take the dividends and earn a rate of return better than this company is delivering. Of course it won't be sustained indefinitely, and I never said that it could be.Maybe I am being to subtle.
Try: "If you have a brain then you shouldn't depend on a company returning 35% ROE consistently because it is simply not possible to sustain."
If you don't know why then good luck - I give up.
I personally wouldn't buy stock with P/E 58 and yield 1.5%Jason Donville has owned Constellation Software (CSU.TO) for a couple years now, with 60% returns
he recommended it on BNN again as a top pick expecting another 60%
he said $250 before he was right, said $300 now (its 295), and says next year will be $400
any CMFers have any comments?